Rajani S Anand, a second year Computer Science student at College of Engineering Adoor (CEA), a Government of Kerala (GoK)’s Institute of Human Resource Development (IHRD) owned self-financial college, committed suicide in 2004 due to her inability to pay the hostel fee of INR 1,200. Jishnu Pranoy, a first-year student at Nehru College of Engineering, a private self-financed Institiute, ‘committed suicide’ in 2017 after being alleged by the management that he had committed cheating in exam. In 2023, Shraddha Sateesh, a second year Food Technology student at Amal Jyothi College of Engineering, a self-financed college owned and operated by the powerful Catholic Church, committed suicide, allegedly following the management’s harassment following the confiscation of her mobile phone during lab work.
Theses:
- The student protest led by Student Federation of India, SFI, (student wing of Communist Party of India (Marxist)) and other organized left student organizations in 2004 following the suicide of Rajani was simultaneously the last and first of its kind of student protests in Kerala.
- Last, because it signalled the last instance of organised student protest at a state level and an organised attempt to directly address neo-liberal reforms in higher education in Kerala.
- First, because it signalled the possibility of a new modality of organised student protests in Kerala where organised student groups – acting as the armed (armed with weapons or with the guarantee of a future secure position in the government) vigilante group of the party in power/party waiting for their turn in share of power – would intervene in student rebellions and subversions so as to de-intervene. SFI intervened in Rajani S Anand protest such that there will not be a mass mobilisation like that in the future – and they succeeded. This is the beginning of a new order of student mobilisation where mobilisation of angry students is actively encouraged/mediated by the ruling/about to rule party so that they do not go all the way of negating political power or destroying institutions. If any spontaneous student rebellion arises, it will either be suppressed or mediated by student organisations.
- If student organisations are forms in which collective student anger and frustration is registered and hence concentrated, this concentration is now repurposed by the state to cover up any potential insurgencies. This is the change in character of organised student movements in the contemporary wherein the presence of student parties (or media) signals that state is measuring the degree of insurgency within particular struggles and is ready to intervene either with force or with power to establish order and mediation.
- Organised student groups are not external to particular struggles. They arise due to internal contradictions within struggles and due to the quest by participants to level differences and bring in mediational politics. In that sense ‘SFI’ – not the particular student group as such but the idea of SFI, which could shape any shape depending on which party is in power – is tendentially internally present in all student struggles as the vector towards which insurgencies will be covered up and valorized for exchange.
- Higher education has long lost its rational justification for existence. It now exists as an openly irrational social institution. And this irrationality is enforced through brute force – a deepening of disciplining process through higher levels of micro-control. There is no direct relation that can be established between educational outcome, professional success, material, mental or physical well-being or civic virtutes anymore. Higher education now openly exists to regiment. In the period prior to the 1990s this regimentation of population was achieved through planned regulation. Here the social basis of technical division of labor – say for example who will join engineering and who will join a poly-technic course and who will join industrial training institutes (ITIs) – had a consensus and followed the hierarchies already present in the social formation in form of class, caste, gender etc. Neo-liberalism dismantled this regulatory framework – as a response to rising class struggle across social units – such that it is direct coercion that is the experience of students, teachers and other workers at the mass level. This also means that traditional means of mediation by state and capital – student unions or trade unions – no longer holds and students are engaged in a permanent fight against the repressive state apparatus.
- The permanent crisis of/in higher education also mean that state is no longer able to plan for student rebellions or subversions or measure them – including suicides. State’s inability to measure the degree of student rebellions/subversions/uprisings also mean that coercive apparatus has become more arbitrary. The response of state/management reveals this utter loss of sense-lessness amongst the ruling class. Thus state now uses arbitrary brute force/brokerage in the case of seemingly minor/local incidents but is unable to judge its own actions in the case of major corruption/irregularity. This is at the same time, an opportunity for Us.
- While the suicide of Rajani in 2004 could be directly linked to a cause – which was then identified as her dire financial situation caused by the government’s decision to start self-financial colleges in Kerala – and hence a demand could be posed to the state in terms of policy change, we have reached a conjuncture where we can no longer derive a causal relation between a phenomenon and the suicide. Both Jishnu and Shraddha committed suicide due to the oppressive systems, whose agents were indeed some individuals; but this oppression is now openly irrational. There is no apparent rational reason for treating women students differentially or controlling every aspect of young students or imposing rules on mobile usage especially in the post-digital/post-pandemic world. It appears that while economy demands students to be ‘flexible’ and ‘independent’, higher educational institutions are acting opposite to this market principle. But the widespread application of arbitrary rules indicates that exploitation in the future workplace demands controlling in the present institution. While the transition between institutions of disciplines – family to school to college to factory to prison – appear to be more fluid and dynamic, what is in fact being experienced is the simultaneous presence of all these institutions at the same time at the same time. Our teacher now embodies the oppression of our fathers, teachers, bosses and landlords at the same time. Thus, control is achieved through deepening of disciplining, deepening into further interiority of the already crisis ridden individuality of neo-liberalism.
- ‘Skills’ have lost meaning in this conjuncture of neo-liberalism and the crisis in the law of value and capital-labor dialectics – which appear to us now as having relative stability in the last century when there was a direct relation between wealth, GDP, job growth and planning process – mean that engineering education has lost its place in the world of wealth creation. Production in the traditional sense of the term – putting labor to work through the use of machinery and a historically specific relation of production such that surplus labor could be extracted at the end of the production cycle – is now incidental to capitalist accumulation. Profit is now derived from share market and production is dictated by changes in the financial market; and not the vice versa. This mean that engineering and engineers are now incidental to profit, and thus they are disposable and precarious. Engineering education expanded in Kerala when objectively there was no need for ‘engineers’ in the economy. Indian engineering education depended on IT and ITES and in the early decades of 2000s, the industry did not need domain knowledge. What it required was a regimented and cheap labor force who could be trained to do outsourced manual repetitive work. This logic was internalised by EE and the presence of oppressive managements is a logical extension of this process.
- Without this logic of regimented workforce, there is no objective way to distinguish between an engineering graduate or a polytechnic graduate or a BSc graduate. What engineering degree in the Global South signals to global capital is the degree of regimentation and disciplining that a student has gone through, compared to a non-engineering student. This includes regimentation in schools to prepare for hyper-competitive entrance exams and regimentation in colleges signaling obedience and least disruption in the post-Fordist production process.
- Thus oppression is not an exception but the norm. But due to its explicit and direct nature, we are in a position to directly relate exploitation to oppression and how traditional oppressive systems are being rearticulated for the purpose of exploitation.
- Student suicide is the new form of student subversion. Affirmation of death by Rajani, Jishnu and Shraddha were acts of rebellions, of screams against the social totality as such. It is not to be reduced to their screams against a particular individual or an institution or a government. Rather they were militating against all of their social fabric. They were militating to re-organise their life such that family could be reorganised, education could be reorgainsed, politics could be reorganised and their own subjective position vis-a-vis others could be reorganised. They realised that their fight against financial difficulty or oppressive management is in fact a fight against everyone they knew and a fight against all institutions they were familiar with. In this sense their act of suicide cuts through their and our own very existence itself.
- An affirmation of this position and the truth of their suicide – truth being a militant subjective intervention to end their individuated existence in capitalist totality – demands us to be true to this revolutionary core of their action. In their act of suicide, they negated their existence as subjects of capital. Their action also objectively negates the organisation of hierarchically ordered higher education in Kerala. Their subjective refusal to be docile subjects is an objective crisis for the re-organisation of social relations.
- Solidarity with Rajani, Jishnu and Shraddha demands that we show fidelity to this truth of their subjective intervention. If EE exists only to regiment and regulate us, we must be willing to inquire into the organisation of EE in the state, how it regulates the large armies of precarious unemployed youth in the state, how it is hierarchically placed vis-a-vis other technical branches of production and what does socialisation of engineering education mean for us, in this conjuncture.
- We cannot ‘demand’ the state to enter the spaces inside campuses because state operates in these interstitial spaces within institutions and between us. State is the oppressive college management itself and a negation of oppression demands a negation of state itself – or the state of affairs itself.
- In their act of fighting for a legitimate reason, the friends of Jishnu and Shraddha realised/are realising that the moment they ask for a just treatment of their particular demands, the total might of the state falls on their back. Though they did not register the totality embedded in their particular struggles, objectively by participating in particular and concrete struggles they are opening a possibility for the negation of the total of capital itself, for the universal is the universality of the particular being an instance of the universal itself.
- Shraddha’s fellow comrades in their fight against the college management has been simultaneously engaged in a struggle to re-organise the social which mediates each of them with each other. Their struggle has been also at the same time a struggle to redefine the terms of engagement that each of them have with each other within the situation and without.
- The only logical step for Shraddha’s comrades in this conjuncture was to occupy the college and through a collective deliberation – a deliberation within the occupation, direct and without mediation – arrive at a general assembly in the Leninist sense of the term. But a subjective turn within the strike could not be achieved and that mark the limit of the struggle here. State mediation thus entered, and strike is withdrawn by the students after state promised a special inquiry into the suicide. This path of compromise was taught to us by organised left such that state of affairs will not be challenged.
- The task of students is now, which is objectively clear but subjectively opaque, to begin inquiry as a mode of politics. Inquiry into the technical composition of capital – how capitalist production apparatus including its organic composition or machinery is changing – and what particular forms of class composition develops and what are the limits of existing mode of politics that we practice.